Monday 27 February 2012

the country's run out of money i wonder why

1 over population over 3 half million  immigrants living here claiming benefits and never paid a dime into the system must be stopped now
2 millions spent on  the EU membership must pull out now
3 million given out on foreign aid must stop now
4 millions spent on illegal wars and we need to pull our troops out now
5 renationalising the gas water electricity bring it back to British company's
6 reintroducing the indusrtys which would create jobs exporting  instead of importing
7 stop borrowing from other country's and sort our own house out first
8 deport all extremists so the burden is not on the tax payers
this is what we need to do to get this country great again

George Osborne: UK has run out of money

The Government 'has run out of money' and cannot afford debt-fuelled tax cuts or extra spending, George Osborne has admitted.

Britain and other leading economies are not ready to fund another eurozone bailout, UK Chancellor George Osborne said on Sunday.
Mr Osborne is under severe pressure to boost growth, amid signs the economy is slipping back into a recession. Photo: PA
In a stark warning ahead of next month’s Budget, the Chancellor said there was little the Coalition could do to stimulate the economy.
Mr Osborne made it clear that due to the parlous state of the public finances the best hope for economic growth was to encourage businesses to flourish and hire more workers.
“The British Government has run out of money because all the money was spent in the good years,” the Chancellor said. “The money and the investment and the jobs need to come from the private sector.”
What should George Osborne do to provide a tax cut?
Mr Osborne’s bleak assessment echoes that of Liam Byrne, the former chief secretary to the Treasury, who bluntly joked that Labour had left Britain broke when he exited the Government in 2010.
He left David Laws, his successor, a one-line note saying: “Dear Chief Secretary, I’m afraid to tell you there’s no money left”.
Mr Osborne is under severe pressure to boost growth, amid signs the economy is slipping back into a recession.
The Institute of Fiscal Studies has urged him to consider emergency tax cuts in the Budget to reduce the risk of a prolonged economic slump.
But the Chancellor yesterday said he would stand firm on his effort to balance the books by refusing to borrow money. “Any tax cut would have to be paid for,” Mr Osborne told Sky News. “In other words there would have to be a tax rise somewhere else or a spending reduction.
“In other words what we are not going to do in this Budget is borrow more money to either increase spending or cut taxes.”
The strongest suggestion of help for squeezed family budgets came from the Chancellor’s claim that he was “very seriously and carefully” considering plans to help lower earners by raising the personal allowance for income tax, a proposal that has been championed by Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister.
But he implied there would be no more help for motorists struggling with record petrol prices this spring. “I have taken action already this year to avoid increases in fuel duty which were planned by the last Labour government,” he said.
The Chancellor’s tough words were echoed by Liberal Democrat Jeremy Browne, the foreign minister, who warned that Britain faced “accelerated decline” without measures to tackle its debt and increase competitiveness.
In an article published today in The Daily Telegraph, he writes that Britain’s market share in the world used to be “dominant” but was now “in freefall” compared with the soaring economies of Asia and South America. “This situation has been becoming more acute for years,” he adds. “It is now staring us in the face. So we need to take action.”
Mr Browne writes that reform of pensions, welfare and defence is essential to stop the departments “collapsing under the weight of their own debt”. “Just because the spending was sometimes on worthy causes does not in itself mean it was affordable,” he says.
“Doing nothing when your prospects are at risk of declining is not the safe option. More of the same may be superficially more popular in the short-term but that does not make it right.”
Amid warnings that Britain urgently needed to adopt a more pro-business outlook, senior Conservatives have urged the Government to get rid of the 50 pence top rate of tax.
Figures from the Treasury last week suggested the policy was not raising the expected amount of revenue and was threatening to drive leading business people and entrepreneurs away from Britain. Dr Liam Fox, the former Conservative Defence Secretary, yesterday argued for the top tax rate to be scrapped, but added that cutting taxes on employment was even more important.
“I would have thought the priority was getting the costs of employers down and therefore I would rather have seen any reductions in taxation on employers’ taxation rather than personal taxation,” he told the BBC’s Sunday Politics show.
Any efforts to scrap the rate this parliament would face severe opposition from within the Coalition.
Simon Hughes, Liberal Democrat deputy leader, said yesterday that keeping the current 50p rate was “the right thing to do”. He told the BBC: “I represent people in a pretty solid working-class community. What they’re concerned about is what happens to ordinary people out of work and where they get jobs.”
Last night, Labour argued Mr Osborne needed to take a more proactive stance on boosting growth by increasing public spending.
Chris Leslie MP, the shadow Treasury minister, said it was wrong of the Chancellor to argue that Britain was broke and to rely on business alone to create economic growth.
“George Osborne can’t complacently wash his hands and claim the lack of jobs and growth in the economy is nothing to do with him,” he said.
“He needs to realise that government has a vital role to play in creating an environment where the private sector can grow and create jobs.”
Harriet Harman, Labour’s deputy leader, urged Mr Osborne to cut VAT.
Meanwhile, the Chancellor made it clear he was resisting pressure to hand over up to another £17.5billion in taxpayers’ money to help bail out struggling European Union countries.
He said Europe had not “shown the colour of its money” by taking measures to help itself tackle its debt problems.
Until that happens, Britain will not give any extra funds to the International Monetary Fund.
The Chancellor was speaking as finance ministers from the world’s 20 most powerful economies met in Mexico.
Mr Osborne said: “While at this G20 conference there are a lot of things to discuss; I don’t think you’re going to see any extra resources committed (to the IMF) here because eurozone countries have not committed additional resources themselves, and I think that quid pro quo will be clearly established here in Mexico City.”

how disgusting is this

we have people who cant get homes like this ex army and we have floods of immigrant walking into our country claiming everything benefits housing tax credits child benefits the lot and this government is so lame in its methods it allows this to happen  thank you Mr Cameron clegg milaband you are really showing us Brits what you think of us apart from the uaf - hate no hope labour conservative lib dem voters who will be thanking you for  all that you have done to the country  the rest of us wont be so keep going the way you are going keep doing the things that you are doing the sheeple are beginning to wake up and it will come back to bite you right where it hurts you know the saying what comes around goes around


'Evicted for being honest': Ex-soldier who declared temporary work loses his benefits and is forced to live in car with his pregnant girlfriend

  • Ex- Army soldier Darren King living in his Vauxhall Astra with pregnant girlfriend
  • He was evicted after declaring temporary work to authorities
Last updated at 1:37 PM on 27th February 2012

An ex-serviceman and his pregnant girlfriend are living in his car after being evicted from their home when he had his benefits cut.
Darren King, 27, lost his privately rented home in Colchester, Essex when he told the authorities he had taken a temporary job.
The former Territorial Army soldier quit the Forces when his first wife was diagnosed with terminal cancer, but after finding new work Mr King had his benefits cut.
Mr King signed up for work with one month's employment with an engineering agency while receiving benefits.
Kicked out: Mr King, pictured with his daughter Lilly-Louise, fell behind on his rent after declaring a temporary job and has now been left living in his car
Kicked out: Mr King, pictured with his daughter Lilly-Louise, fell behind on his rent after declaring a temporary job and has now been left living in his car
But after declaring his work he had his housing benefits removed and has been left living in the back of his Vauxhall Astra because he cannot pay rent.
When he fell two months behind on rental payments the bailiffs were called in and he was made homeless along with his pregnant girlfriend, who is due to give birth in two months.
Mr King's plight emerged as David Cameron said ministers should do more to ensure service personnel and their families get council houses or mortgages when they leave the forces.
The Remembrance weekend initiative aims to end the scandal of veterans being left too poor to buy a home and unable to get on a social housing list.
Mr King claims his housing benefit, which he had used to cover his rent, was taken from him without his knowledge.
 
The ex-Army member is now living in a Vauxhall Astra in a lay-by just outside Tiptree, Essex, and says he has been told he may have to wait eight weeks before he can be found emergency housing.
Mr King had received £640 for one month's work and also received housing benefit and child tax handouts for his daughter Lilly-Louise King.
Most of the family's belongings are in storage, which is paid for out of child tax credits.
His seven-year-old daughter is living with the couple's former neighbours.
Mr King could be living in his car with his pregnant girlfriend (who did not want to be identified) for up to eight weeks before he finds emergency housing
Mr King could be living in his car with his pregnant girlfriend (who did not want to be identified) for up to eight weeks before he finds emergency housing
Despite ending the one-month stint with the engineering agency and proving he no longer worked, he still had his benefits removed and the bailiffs were called to remove him and his pregnant girlfriend from their rented home last week.
Mr King served in the Territorial Army for five years until 2008 when his first wife was diagnosed with terminal cancer.
He left the Forces to be with her received housing and child benefits.
He was received bereavement handouts when his wife passed away in March 2009.
Mr King said: 'I wonder why I bothered signing up to protect my country if this is the way I am treated. It is ridiculous.'
He met his now partner and spent a month with an engineering agency.
Mr King added: 'I would have been better off not working.
'The Government wants people to stop claiming and start working. I did and it cost me my home. I did everything right and I don’t understand it.'
Soldiers will go to the top of the queue for a council house or mortgage when they leave the Army under new government plans.
Housing minister Grant Shapps will issue new guidance to local authorities to put retiring servicemen automatically into the highest priority category for a council house after  the homeless.
He will call on them to ‘positively discriminate’ in favour of former soldiers, sailors and airmen where tough decisions have to be taken.

'The Government wants people to stop claiming and start working. I did and it cost me my home.'
Anyone leaving the forces will also go to the top of the list for help through the Government’s FirstBuy scheme, which helps the less well-off buy a house with small deposits.
A spokesperson for Colchester Council said the authority would not comment on individual cases.
The spokesperson said: 'In general, when someone is found intentionally homeless they have the right to appeal the decision.
'An appeal is sent to an external service and is reviewed; they have 56 days to make this decision.
'If an intentional homeless decision is made, the council has an interim duty to provide temporary accommodation if persons in question are street homeless for a reasonable time after the decision and have not had the opportunity to look for alternative accommodation.
'People who find themselves in this situation are advised they should seek help from social services.
'They are also given other housing advice about privately renting and applying to the housing register.
'All circumstances are taken into account at the time of the decision.
'Should an appeal decision overturn the council’s initial intentional decision we will provide these persons with emergency accommodation.'


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2107126/Ex-soldier-family-living-car-evicted.html#ixzz1naimIJIq

what a complete mess this country really is we have lib/con/lab to thank for this

what a complete mess this country is we have the likes of the lib/con/lab/uaf/hate no hope to thank for all this ye we do have layabouts and benefit dependants(druggies -alcoholics )
 that we need to sort out so these ethnics are not to blame for all of this the governments past and present are at blame for allowing this to happen when will all this end when will the sheeple wake up and stop voting these traitors and tyrants in plus when will we get out of the EU to this date non of the 3 main party's have answered these questions  instead they keep feed the sheeple lies every election this happens we need to seriously start realising that this country can take no more and its time for a nationalist government


Benefits families could pay off £1m mortgage

Almost 100 families are raking in enough housing benefit to fund a £1million mortgage, raising fresh doubts over the Government’s cap, figures released yesterday show.

Saeed Khaliif in West Hampstead
Last year Saeed Khaliif, 49, who was unemployed, was able to sign what was believed to be a £2,000 a week lease for the six – bedroom property despite having no connection with their new area Photo: WARREN ALLOTT
Almost 100 families are raking in enough housing benefit to fund a £10 million mortgage, raising fresh doubts over the Government’s cap, figures released yesterday show.
Some 30 families are receiving £1,500 a week — three times what they would be earning on a national average wage — to pay their rent while another 60 are receiving up to £5,000 a month, according to the Department for Work and Pensions.
All the claimants, who would be able to fund a seven-figure mortgage at those rates, live in the London boroughs of Kensington and Chelsea or Westminster.
One critic said the figures showed that it was an “unfair” system that punished hard-earning families who could not always afford to live where they wished.
In total 130 families are given more than £1,000 a week,
including 80 who receive at least £1,100 a week, according to figures obtained under the Freedom of Information Act.
This is in stark contrast to the majority of the near five million claimants, four in five of whom receive less than £100 a week.
Concerns over housing benefit deepened in 2010 when it emerged that a family of former asylum seekers from Somalia were getting £2,000 per week to live in a £2.1million home in Kensington. Abdi Nur, 42, an unemployed bus conductor, his wife Sayruq, 40, and their seven children moved after complaining their previous home had been in a “poor” part of the city.
Last year, another family who fled war-ravaged Somalia exchanged a modest home in Coventry for a £2million house in West Hampstead, north-west London. Saeed Khaliif, 49, who was unemployed, was able to sign what was believed to be a £2,000 a week lease for the six – bedroom property despite having no connection with their new area.
The Government announced last year that housing benefit, which currently costs the taxpayer £22billion every year, should be capped at £400 per week for any new applicants from last April.
Anyone in receipt of greater handouts prior to that date was given nine months to move to a cheap property or renegotiate rents to come under the cap.
But as of September, some 10,480 families were still being paid in excess of £400 a week for rent. It raises serious doubts as to how many will meet the transition deadline.
Emma Boon of the TaxPayers’ Alliance said: “This is further evidence that it is right to cap benefits. It is unfair to ask taxpayers to pay for swanky central London homes for others when they can’t afford to live in those postcodes themselves.
A DWP spokeswoman said: “These figures underline exactly why our Housing Benefit reforms are so necessary.”
Liam Byrne, the shadow work and pensions secretary, said the figures underlined the need for a benefits cap. But he said the fact that the highest claimants were in London showed the need for different caps in different parts of the country.