Wednesday 26 December 2012

more misery in the city of stoke on trent thanks to our so called great labour party

Government funding reductions could see Stoke-on-Trent City Council face £50m cuts

Trusted article source icon
Friday, December 21, 2012
Profile image for The Sentinel
GOVERNMENT ministers have masked the scale of cuts facing the region's councils by 'smuggling' huge reductions into the second half of a two-year funding agreement, it is claimed.
Eric Pickles pledged Stoke-on-Trent City Council would lose just 0.2 per cent of its 'spending power' next year in the latest round of Government cuts to council funding – handing the council one of the best settlements in the country.
  1. Mohammed Pervez
    Council leader Mohammed Pervez has accused the government of fiddling with the figures.
But the authority's finance managers say emerging details about the second year of funding in the same settlement mean spending power will actually be cut by more than five per cent over two years.
It means cuts of £50 million – including £21.1 million in 2013/14 – will go ahead.
Peter Bates, the city council's director of finance, accused the Department of Communities and Local Government (DCLG) of releasing inaccurate funding information in an error-strewn official email.
He said: "It's hugely disappointing from my perspective. They are still doing their sums. We still don't have all of the information we need but based on the headline figures they have provided we are much worse off than suggested.
"I received a personally-addressed email today from the civil service at the DCLG – and the figures do not even add up. That's the sort of professionalism we're dealing with at the moment.
"Funding for 2013/14 will be better than predicted, although by how much is still not clear. But what they have given us in 13/14 they have taken away, and more, in 2014/15."
Mr Pickles has faced criticism for releasing funding data based on 'spending power' calculations, which offset funding cuts by taking into account assumed income from the NHS, house-building bonuses and business rates.
Newcastle Borough Council expects the true scale of cuts to be more than double the DCLG's announcement of a 2.1 per cent reduction in spending power – leading to additional cuts of £1 million from 2014.
City council leader Mohammed Pervez, below, said: "They have fiddled with the figures to make the percentages look lower. If you look at the detail, we have again been hit very hard.
"To some extent the percentages are irrelevant. We want to know what the absolute cut to our funding is and they still haven't made that clear. In the first year we probably are a little bit better off than expected – but they are taking all of the money back and more in the second year.
"We are expecting to have to make savings of £50 million over two years. It is our worst nightmare, brought to life.
"They've made it sound like they've done the city a favour but in fact these are deep cuts which are seriously undermining our efforts to provide jobs and growth in the city."       

and yet the people will vote for the corrupt lying two faced labour councillors what they don't tell you is that we have a debt off council tax rent outstanding will they lose there salaries oh no only recently they voted for a pay rise but as per usual they will blame the government but 1 question labour are the opposition party why are they not representing there voters and saying no considering the voters voted them in but as usual a total waste of time its a bout time stoke on trent loses these losers and voted them out once and for all

merry christmas and a happy new year to all

just wishing all my followers a happy Christmas and a happy new year

Saturday 1 December 2012

yet more community centers gone

'Betrayed' users of Ball Green Community Centre will 'never vote Labour again'Trusted article source iconSaturday, November 10, 2012Profile image for The SentinelThe SentinelRESIDENTS who are set to lose their battle to save a popular community centre have vowed never to vote Labour again.People who use Norton and Ball Green Community Centre say they feel ‘betrayed’ by Labour city councillors Andrew Lilley and Duncan Walker, who voted to close the facilities across Stoke-on-Trent.They say they are not to prepared to take on the running of the centre which is earmarked for closure on January 31.Greg Stockton, chairman of the centre’s committee, said: “I am totally devastated about leaving this place, as are all the people who use it.“It is a vital part of the community and I can’t believe our Labour councillors have betrayed us in this way.“I have voted Labour all my life, but never again.”Stoke-on-Trent City Council offered committees a community asset transfer to take over the responsibility of running the centres.Greg added: “We can’t afford to run it on our own but our offer of £5,000 to help with costs was ignored.”Norton Community Centre is used by around 600 people a week who attend pensioner groups and dance clubs. The twice weekly bingo night will now be held at the Norton Workingmen’s Club.Greg added: “We just wanted to take a small piece of the community centre with us. Other groups will have to arrange their own space.”Volunteer Dawn Sarapuk, aged 51, of Burnett Place, Norton, said: “We’re trying to make the best of a bad situation, but a lot of these people are elderly and disabled and can’t travel the extra distance.”Committee member June Burgess, aged 79, of Pinfold Avenue, Norton, said: “It’s like the council is trying to divide us. The committee has worked so hard to keep the centre going. We’re going to have to do our best to continue as a community.”Members of the Labour-controlled city council voted unanimously to reject a motion calling for the £162,000 hall subsidy cuts to be referred to a scrutiny committee for further debate last month. It followed the presentation of a petition signed by more than 3,100 residents demanding a rethink.Committee member Roy Wedgwood, aged 82, of Sneyd Green, said: “Democracy is taking into account the opinions of the people. Our council clearly doesn’t know the meaning of the word. There are plenty of us here who regularly voted Labour. I don’t think there are many, if any, who ever will again.”Residents have decided to donate any surplus money from the centre’s accounts and sale of assets – around £5,000 – to local charities.The council operates community halls in Tunstall, Packmoor, Norton and Ball Green, Goldenhill, Bentilee, Meir Park, Joiners Square, Smallthorne, Bradeley and Fenton. Halls in Birches Head and Smallthorne have already been closed down.Councillor Ruth Rosenau, cabinet member for regeneration, planning and transportation, said: “There is a community asset transfers policy and the council will support and assist groups where possible, to achieve this.“Any new community groups which have not registered an expression of interest can still approach the council to work on drafting a business plan for asset transfer.”yet this morning i have received a text saying smallthorne is to be kept open now is it the fact that this council has of loaded it onto the residents of smallthorne through a community asset transfer or is the council doing what it was elected into do and they are running what ever has  now being decide going by labours track record it will lead to it closing whether it be now or 1-2 years it will happen it will close and   now if its down to the residents association and the community to run it they have all the repairs to fund out for but when its the council and its so called good guys of councilors to look after these premises they were elected in to represent us and they are not doing this by any means which it is complete betrayal of all the people around here  but labour is the pulling the wool over people eyes and they are falling right into the trap lets see what the future brings because ill stress now ill be here in 5-10-15 years still digging away at this evil curupt labour council like the saying is what goes around comes around the worm will turn and when it does ill expose everything these so called good guys have done the day will come and all these vile lies all these curupt ways will be  brought out people will get to no the truth the proper truth not the lies that labour spew with there lapdogs ( hope not hate -uaf -norfscarf)  i will stress again the people of this area have brought and payed for this facility through means of the taxes they have payed in and the sole responsibility lies with the council to run them but oh no labour doing what they do best punishing the people of this city now  how much these labour councilors try to play the good guys they voted for the closer of these places in the budget all 33 of them VOTED now we only have to look at what they got planned next building a eye sore of a building in hanley forget about the people who work in stoke that doesn't matter perves and his goonified followers want it in hanley yet more jobs lost that's should tell people what all labour councilors stand for and what there agenda is  but lets see what the mandate for destruction brings next ill be watching with anticipation to see what labour and its mandate of destruction brings  

Sunday 11 November 2012

labour openly support this kind of behavior typical labour voter


“Muslims: Bin Your Poppy!” Says Mr Hate Himself, Anjem Choudary #casualsunited #edl #evf #cxf #bfp

“Bin Your Poppies!” Radical Islamist Preacher Anjem Choudary Sparks Twitter Outrage

Anjem Choudary
Radical preacher Anjem Choudary has called on all Muslims in Britain to destroy their Remembrance Day poppies.
The Islamist, who was born and educated in the UK, sent a stream of messages to his 2,500 Twitter followers, with the tagline BIN YOUR POPPY.
The tweets included:
Choudary, a prominent figure in banned groups such as Islam4UK and Muslims Against Crusades, has repeatedly courted controversy with his militant Islamic stance. He has previously stated that Islam plans to dominate Britain and America, that Shariah law zones should be established across the UK, and that Norwegian nationals should be taken hostage in retribution for the massacre perpetrated by anti-Islam campaigner Anders Breivik.

Wednesday 31 October 2012

Labour uaf hope not hate norfscarf call us the nazi and racists


UK Pakistani Muslims Openly Express Support For Adolf Hitler and The Holocaust

I was recently sent this disgusting screenshot (Click to enlarge) thanks too Soldat Amir.
The screenshot is of the Facebook page “Proud to be a Pakistani” which is run by UK based, Pakistani Muslim admins.
The admins of the page posted an image condemning the anti-Muslim Movie released in America, below it was an image of Adolf Hitler accompanied by the text “Let Me Salute To Hitler The Great” as well as praising a disgusting phrase Adolf Hitler made about the Jews, after slaughtering over 6 Million Jewish men, women and children.
Adolf Hitler was once quoted saying: “The only religion I respect is Islam. The only prophet I admire is the Prophet Muhammad.” 
Islamic support for Hitler and Nazism is nothing new. The Grand Mufti of Jerusalem helped design the gas chambers that were used to exterminate hundreds of Jews at a time in Auschwitz and many other extermination camps, The Mufti, hoping that the Germans would win the war, was planning to return to Jerusalem and exterminate the remaining Jews living in the holy land.
It is also common knowledge that, following the Nazi occupation of Yugoslavia, the Nazi forces formed a Bosnian Muslim SS division, The Nazi’s also armed Indian Muslims during World War 2, and there was even a Waffen SS Tiger division which comprised of mainly Muslims, although they never saw action, the division still existed.
The admin of the page asked for those who agree to “like” the picture, the picture then received 33 likes in the first few hours and counting, as well as Muslim comments expressing support, such as: “The great man [referring to Adolf Hitler] of the world” and “He was very smart, he was aware who is who” comments are highlighted in red:
The admins are then hypocritical enough to post a picture of two Dhimmi’s holding placards too demand  an end to “attacks on Muslims” and “anti-Muslim bigotry” whilst at the same time agreeing with the idea’s and actions of one of the most bigoted, racist mass murderers in history.
As you can see, the picture upload location states: London, England.
Thank You for reading,

Tuesday 23 October 2012

being called a racist is slander


Slander Law & Legal Definition

Slander is the oral communication of false statements that are harmful to a person's reputation. If the statements are proven to be true, it is a complete defense to a charge of slander. Oral opinions that don't contain statements of fact don't constitute slander. Slander is an act of communication that causes someone to be shamed, ridiculed, held in contempt, lowered in the estimation of the community, or to lose employment status or earnings or otherwise suffer a damaged reputation. Slander is a subcategory of defamation.
The basic elements of a claim of slander include;
  1. a defamatory statement;
  2. published to third parties; and
  3. which the speaker or publisher knew or should have known was false.
Slander is primarily covered under state law, but is subject to First Amendment guarantees of free speech. The scope of constitutional protection extends to statements of opinion on matters of public concern that do not contain or imply a provable factual assertion. If the slander unjustly accused you of a crime or reflected on your profession, the court or jury can assess the damages. For other types of slander you generally must prove some actual damage to be able to recover.
Slander of title is a common law tort involving a disparaging remark regarding ownership of property. It affects the owner's ability to transfer the property, resulting in a monetary loss.

in other words being called a racist when clearly theres no proof constitutes to slander so  for me  for instance being called a racist when its clearly not true is slander and clearly against the law 

Sunday 21 October 2012

the community centre of smallthorne

The group of stoke bnp have being out distributing my leaflet. What the leaflet tells you is that the marxist labour council of stoke on trent is enforcing tory policy and taking the facility's from the people of this once great city. The people of this once great city have bought and payed for these facilities by means of council tax  and other taxes forced upon them. So this is neglect from these councilors what this marxist labour council is asking is for the community to take over the running of this centre there for the amount needed is £31,000 but why should these residents have to find that? labour are always telling us that they represent us  but is it fair now to say that they don't so what miliband was saying in the labour conference was false. A UNITED BRITAIN  UNDER LABOUR who is he trying to kid more like uniting more of the tax payers money into his party and his own pockets whilst the rest of us suffer. This is what has happened since labour as taken charge in stoke on trent




ive posted a videohttp://youtu.be/6_k_mxfVXO4  please have a watch

im  with a local resident of the smallthorne area




Sunday 7 October 2012

Goldendale pool Stoke on Trent


i am writing this to show my support for the anglers of this glorious pool now this pool is in a area that is filled with wild life and in no way should this be facing being filled in now im a fishing person and i want to support this campaign to keep this pool open we went down there yesterday and i had a walk around and its a beautiful area full of nature and to even consider doing such a drastic unconciderate thing is a outrage an outrage on nature and to the blokes who fish this pond and to fill the pond in with the fish in there its outrageous this pond holds two of the biggests  fish in the area and nature should be left alone  i want to no what the local labour councilor of that area is planning to do about the matter

Saturday 6 October 2012

full explanation needed but will we get one

now if this was a bnp councilor or independent there would be up roar in the council chamber but because its labour i stress LABOUR nothing not a squeak form labour head office or local about this now i call for a full explanation the people of not just the ward he represents but the city want to know
 1 why was he cautioned ( i no its for fraud but in what manner)
 2 why has the local and national labour party not spoken about this
 do the people of this city not deserve a explanation on this or is this a cover up as per usual from the labour party and perves


Wednesday 3 October 2012

funny how a labour councilor only gets cautioned for fraud





Police caution for Weston Coyney councillor Matt Fry over fraud 'by abuse of position'

Trusted article source icon
Wednesday, October 03, 2012
Profile image for The Sentinel
A SUSPENDED city councillor has been formally cautioned by police for fraud.
Labour councillor Matt Fry was arrested by officers before receiving a caution for fraud 'by abuse of position'.
  1. Cllr Matt Fry.
    Cllr Matt Fry has been cautioned by police for fraud.
The 32-year-old member for Weston Coyney faces no further criminal proceedings but questions remain over his political future.
Stoke-on-Trent City Council said the offence does not relate directly to his work as a councillor.
Mr Fry, of Parkfield Road, in Dresden, was unavailable for comment last night.
and mick gets found guilty   of a phoney charge made up by the gestapo police and joy garner  

Thursday 27 September 2012

please read norfscarf uaf hate no hope and all deluded lefties

finally we get told we were right all along this bloke who as done this article needs thanking and coming from the sun it does surprise me

Sunday 23 September 2012

what a absolute load of crap

where does lowles think of these ideas because for someone who has terrorists mates and also third party leaflets for the country destroying  pedophile labour party he really does speak a load of horse muck we i stress we the bnp do not denie the holocaust we signed the holocaust book in the local council try looking at the video on you tube called the forgotten evidence of Auschwitz the British government knew all along and yet  did nothing about it   lowles you forgot to tell people about Harrods as well about the group you belong to that bombed Harrods in london and you then left the area didn't you change the bloody story its getting boring now



heres something that lowles should answer hes involved with terriorists 

During the 1990s, Lowles was involved with the self-styled Anti-Fascist Action. The Red Action part of this, which Lowles was close to, carried out the 1993 Harrods terrorist attack; a bombing linked to the PIRA in which four people were injured. Lowles' co-members, Patrick Hayes and Jan Taylor were convincted for the terrorist attack.[1][2][3][4][5]
 (the forgotten evidence of Auschwitz please look on youtube  please have a watch   

Friday 21 September 2012

is this some kind of a joke (labours open door policie again)

yet again we see what labours open door policie brings this just is not right why are we suffering and disabled suffering and elderly suffering for this farce milaband and co need to explain why this is happening this all comes from labours run of 13 years of power when will the sheeple WAKE UP this is the labour party that brought you this and yet you still vote for them WHY ? NORFSCARF UAF HOPE NOT HATE SHOULD BE HANGING THERE HEADS IN SHAME OVER THIS AND STORY'S LIKE IT its our people suffering now and it needs changing seriously changing there's people working for £6.08 hr and she gets more in one week and yet she demands a bigger house and we have homeless troops people without housing such a joke


Latvian mother who already receives £34,000 in benefits demands a bigger council house for her TEN children

  • Linda Kozlovska pays £100 a week rent for her three bedroom terraced home in Boston, Lincolnshire
  • She earns £10,000 a year more than the average British worker in benefits 
  • Her children share bedrooms in their home and a mattress has been placed in the living room 
  • Council says the family are 'vulnerable' but workmen say they are frequently called to fix damage at the property

Linda Kozlovska
Claiming: Linda Kozlovska, 31, pays a reported £100 a week rent to a private landlord for her three-bedroom terraced home in Boston, Lincolnshire

Neighbours reacted with outrage last night after an immigrant mother of ten who receives £34,000 a year in benefits demanded that the council gives her a larger home.
Latvian Linda Kozlovska, 31, arrived in Britain with three of her children in 2008 and moved into a council-maintained three-bedroom house.
Four years later, however, the single mother says she is unhappy living there – because she has had three more children and four others have moved over from Latvia.
‘I have ten children living here with me,’ she said. ‘I’m the only adult. I am on the council waiting list, but we’re still here.
‘They don’t have a big enough house.  I want a bigger house. I don’t like it here. When we moved in it had bed bugs.’
Her neighbours are fuming. They say up to 18 people lived in the terraced home at one point, creating mess outside.
One claimed the property was, essentially, a ‘halfway house’ for Latvians when they first arrive in the country.
Another neighbour, Neil Blanchard, 39, said: ‘This kind of thing is beyond belief. If they want a bigger house they should have to earn it like everybody else.
‘It is not for the taxpayer to pick up the bill for a bigger house.’
But the council appears to be supporting her, with one councillor saying he is ‘sympathetic’ to her demands.
Miss Kozlovska, a self-employed cleaner, pays only £100 in rent a week to a private landlord for the house in Boston, Lincolnshire. The property is maintained for her by Boston borough council.
She claims working tax credits, child tax credits and child benefits. Every week, she receives £527 in child tax credit and working tax credit as well as £127 in child benefits. In total, she receives £34,000 a year from the state – far more than the average UK salary of just over £26,000 before tax.
The amount is also much higher than the £9.26 per child she would receive each month if she were still living in Latvia.
There, couples can claim up to £1,865 per baby, but payments dip after children reach 18 months.
Linda Kozlovska
Home: Nearby workmen said they are frequently called to the privately-rented three bedroom house in Boston (pictured) to fix damage caused by the children. They said they constantly slam windows and break hinges
Miss Kozlovska claimed she has ‘no choice but to move’ from the house because her children are crammed inside, with some having to sleep on mattresses in the  living room. 
 
‘I came to England to live – because we are from Latvia, which is in the EU, I could just come,’  she said.
Miss Kozlovska added that she was concerned the council ‘may be angry now and make me go back to Latvia’.
Linda Kozlovska, 31, from Latvia lives with her 10 kids
Up keep: The backyard of the three bedroom house has cracked paving and furniture sacked outside
'I came to England to live – because we are from Latvia, which is in the EU, I could just come'
Linda Kozlovska
She lives in the house with Russandra, 16, Liene, 13, Julian, 12, Sandija, 11, Marko, ten, Janis, eight, Diana, seven, Rolands, four, and twins Edvard and Alan, three.
The three youngest children were born in Britain and the others have joined her from Latvia over the last four years.
Miss Kozlovska will not reveal how many men fathered her children. One of her neighbours, who asked not to be named, said: ‘There have been up to 18 people living there.
‘There have also been complaints about the rubbish which has been put outside the property. The council know about it.
Linda Kozlovska
Plea to move: Writing on the wall of the rented home. Ms Kozlovska says she's the only adult living in the house and she doesn't like the home as when she moved in it had bed bugs
Linda Kozlovska, 31, from Latvia lives with her 10 kids
General street view: Ms Kozlovska privately rents the house and all the maintenance is carried out by the landlord. A general view of the road is pictured. The average income for a UK taxpayer in 2008 was £24,769
‘It is almost like it is a halfway house for people arriving from Latvia, who then move on.’ A builder, who asked not to be named, said: ‘I often do jobs on the house.
'I am sympathetic to her needs. I am also sympathetic to the needs of ten children. It is not ideal that they are living in overcrowded accommodation'
Mike Gilbert, Boston council
‘The kids are everywhere. There is nothing wrong with the house. There was nothing wrong with it when she moved in, anyway.’
But Mike Gilbert, the councillor in charge of housing at Boston council, said: ‘I am sympathetic to her needs.
‘I am also sympathetic to the needs of ten children. It is not ideal that they are living in overcrowded accommodation.
‘On the other hand providing accommodation for a mother with ten children is a fairly big ask in most areas, let alone Boston where that isn’t readily available.’


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2206255/Latvian-mother-demands-bigger-council-house-despite-raking-34k-benefits.html#ixzz277wJshGx
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Tuesday 11 September 2012

explanation needed

just one question i no ive got so called anti fascists (norfscarf)watching my blog can you explain this this is what the true extent of labours open door policie does  don't get me wrong these people are not to blame all these people are doing is what the likes of what you and me would do for a better life security so i stress i do not blame them i work along side foreign nationals on a daily basis and for me they are welcome because i will tell you why
 1 they will work
  2 they are not idle
  3 they pay taxes into the system unlike druggies alcoholics  and general layabouts( we all no what im on about there don't we )
so for all you hope not hate norfscarf uaf  any other person that thinks the tax payer should foot the bill this needs answering and an explanation to every person in this country why this farce is happening



Sunday 9 September 2012

one for cllr joy garner of stoke on Trent council

i would like joy garner  of norfscarf /labour to tell us her feelings on this does she think that it is exeptable for this kind of thing to happen by whats happened this week i should think so  seems she has removed the right of freedom of speech against every person that does not agree with what her and her party LABOUR enforce us with this should be a wake up call for very single person in this city and country of what labours intentions are what there evil agenda is and what will be coming to us if we dare to speak our minds i look forward to her reply



‘Nobody should know about this and the girl must not complain… ‘

The child brides: Muslim mosque leaders agree to marry girl of 12 in Britain… so long as parents don’t tell anyone
British Muslim mosque leaders are agreeing to carry out secret marriages with child brides as young as 12 in the UK, it emerged today.
In an undercover investigation, a Shi’te mosque leader agreed to marry a 12-year-old girl so long as she was a willing participant.
A Sunday Times journalist visited the Husaini Islamic Centre in Peterborough – the ‘first Shi’te mosque in the whole of Europe’ – posing as the father of a 12-year-old girl.
According to the newspaper, the reporter was told by Imam Mohamed Kassamali that ‘under sharia [Islamic law] there is no problem’ in marrying a 12-year-old.
But while he declared Islamic Law dictated a girl should see ‘her first sign of puberty at the house of her husband’, he admitted they would all get in to trouble if she went to police saying she was forced into the marriage.
He told the parents he would need to meet the bride and groom to be sure they were happy to go ahead with the marriage and urged them to delay having intimate relations until they were older.
When approached by the newspaper he insisted he would only have carried out the ceremony if it was allowed under British law and if both parties had not been coerced into the marriage.
But another retired Imam, Abdul Haque, who worships at the Shoreditch Mosque in east London, agreed to carry out the ceremony on the condition the parents kept it a secret from the authorities.
The Imam urged the undercover reporter to lie about the marriage and keep it a secret.
Haque said: ‘Tell people it is an engagement but it will be a marriage.
‘In Islam, once the girl reaches puberty the father has the right, the parents have the right, but under the laws of this country if the girl complains and says her marriage has been arranged and she wasn’t of marriageable age, then the person who performed the marriage will be jailed as well as the mother and father.’
He then warned: ‘Nobody should know about this and the girl must not complain… If she talks in school they will take the girl, social workers will take her and afterwards you and I will be in trouble.’
The current British law allows for Imans to carry out religious marriage ceremonies of consenting brides and grooms aged under 16 so long as they don’t have sex until they are 16.
Under Sharia law both parties must to consent to the marriage and they can then live as man and wife and have sex irrespective of age.
But under British law, the legal age of consent is 16, so a husband could be prosecuted for rape if he has sex with a girl under that age – even if it is his wife.
But campaigners claim that the current law doesn’t protect young Muslim people from being forced into marriages – stating a child is not capable of agreeing to marriage.
Courts now have the power to issue forced marriage protection orders (FMPOs) against a person suspected of trying to force a person into marriage and breach of the order is treated as contempt of court.